Compare OpenText UFT One vs Tricentis Tosca (2024)

  • Home
  • OpenText UFT Onevs.Tricentis Tosca

OpenText UFT One

Tricentis Tosca

OpenText UFT One

Read 89 OpenText UFT One reviews

5,166 views|3,135 comparisons

Tricentis Tosca

Read 96 Tricentis Tosca reviews

6,596 views|3,460 comparisons

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the complete report

Buyer's GuideOpenText UFT One vs. Tricentis ToscaMarch 2024

Executive Summary

Updated on Apr 6, 2022

We performed a comparison between Micro Focus UFT One and Tricentis Tosca based on our users’ reviews in four categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.

  • Ease of Deployment: The vast majority of Micro Focus UFT One’s users feel that it is an easy and straightforward product to deploy. Most users of Tricentis Tosca also feel that it is an easy and straightforward product to deploy. However, a number of reviewers feel that users have to learn how to use the tool before deploying it.
  • Features: Reviewers of Micro Focus UFT One point out that its valuable features include its powerful integration and reporting capabilities. However, the product’s automation capabilities could be improved.

    Reviewers of Tricentis Tosca point out that it has many valuable features. These include its automation capabilities and its user interface. However, despite the fact that some users find the user interface to be valuable, other users feel that its user interface could be improved.

  • Pricing: Many users of both solutions find them to be rather expensive to use. However there are some users of both of these solutions who are satisfied with the cost of the products.
  • Service and Support: There are users who feel that the technical support that both Micro Focus UFT One and Tricentis Tosca offer are very effective. However, some users of these products think that their technical support teams could be improved.

Comparison of Results: Based on the parameters we compared, Tricentis Tosca seems to be a superior solution. All other things being more or less equal, our reviewers found that Micro Focus UFT One’s automation capabilities could be improved.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText UFT One vs. Tricentis Tosca Report (Updated: March 2024).

Download the complete report

765,637 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Featured Review

Compare OpenText UFT One vs Tricentis Tosca (4)

MohibSDET

Senior Test Automation Consultant at PROSSE

Researched Tricentis Tosca but chose OpenText UFT One: A highly stable and flexible tool that provides quick and accurate results

Compare OpenText UFT One vs Tricentis Tosca (5)

Anonymous User

Senior at a financial services firm

Researched OpenText UFT One but chose Tricentis Tosca: Using exploratory testing, we can send an email to record manual test cases to the business analysts.

Our organization is satisfied with this product on the technical side of it, but our organization was looking for the reporting part of this... Read more →

Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"With frequent releases, using automation to perform regression testing can save us huge amount of time and resources.""I like the Help feature in UFT One. For example, if you are navigating a particular window, where there are different options. One wouldn’t know the purpose of every option, but there is no need to search because that window contains a Help button. If you click on that Help button, it directly navigates to the respective help needed. VBScript is very easy to understand and easy to prepare scripts with minimal learning curve.""We have used it for the web and Windows-based applications. It is very productive in terms of execution.""Has improved our organization by allowing us to obtain fast, detailed information about the behavior of our products and to supply this to the customer, enabling us to work together without the need for special programming knowledge.""It is easy to automate and new personnel can start learning automation using UFT One. You don't have to learn any scripting.""Micro Focus UFT One is a great tool and can be used in a variety of ways.""The shared repositories can be used throughout all testing which makes jobs easier.""The most valuable feature of Micro Focus UFT One is you are able to use it with many other technologies. I have not had an instance where the solution was not able to automate or execute automation. I was able to use COBOL to manage some automation."

More OpenText UFT One Pros →

"Tricentis Tosca is well integrated with other products like Jira.""We have multiple applications, and it supports parallel execution. It has mobile automation.""We have to automate thousands of test cases and complete end-to-end SAP on business processes. To manually execute these tasks, it would take us at least two months. By automating these tasks using Tosca, now it takes five to 10 days maximum. Tricentis Tosca is a codeless or scriptless automation tool.""The most valuable features of Tricentis Tosca are all the test automation functionality. It is a full-scale automation tool.""You can quickly build automated testing, manage it, and have it run on a regular basis to ensure that there are no issues.""We like the fact that it works across mobile, desktop, web, and APIs. Due to this, the solution has a broad range of applications.""The product enables codeless automation.""It's integrated with different technologies, desktop applications, package solutions like SAP, and mobile applications."

More Tricentis Tosca Pros →

Cons

"The artificial intelligence functionality is applicable only on the web, and it should be expanded to cover non-web applications as well.""Sometimes, the results' file size can be intense. I wish it was a little more compact.""Micro Focus UFT One could benefit from creating modules that are more accessible to non-technical users. Without a developer background or at least basic knowledge of VBScript, using Micro Focus UFT One may not be feasible for everyone. This is something that Micro Focus, now owned by OpenText, should consider in order to cater to business professionals as well. While Micro Focus UFT One does have a recording function, it still requires a certain level of IT proficiency to create effective automation, which may be challenging for those outside of the technical field.""It should consume less CPU, and the licensing cost could be lower.""You have to deal with issues such as the firewall and how can the tool talk with the application, i.e., if the application is on a company network and so on. That, of course, is important to figure out.""Sometimes it appears that UFT takes a while to open and sometimes will run slower than expected. Also, UFT uses a lot of memory. On this note, if you are running UFT on a virtual server I would add more RAM memory than the minimum requirements especially when using multiple add-ins. HP is pretty good about coming out with new patches to fix known issues and it pays for the user to check for new patches and updates on a regular basis.""Technical support could be improved.""Scripting has become more complex from a maintenance standpoint to support additional browsers."

More OpenText UFT One Cons →

"Tricentis Tosca's performance could be better. Sometimes when we are remapping or when it is loading it can take a lot of time. There are free solutions that have better performance in this area.""They need to improve on the reports after the execution of automation tests, since all the current organizations are looking for detailed graphical reports.""The user management could improve in Tricentis Tosca because it is confusing. It would be better to have it in one place. Having to add it to the cloud and to a specific project can be a mess.""The tool lags in client-based applications. We have also encountered issues with the features in integrations.""While the initial setup was straightforward, we required assistance with the configuration to ensure that everything was done correctly.""First, Tricentis could improve Tosca's Linux scripting. We can automate Linux scripting, but there are a few commands that Tosca doesn't support. DVS support and the object identification mechanism could also be better.""I have found that some of the functions could be missed in the solution for new users. They are not obviously present.""I would like a better user interface."

More Tricentis Tosca Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice

  • "It took about five years to break even. UFT is costly."
  • "The licensing and pricing model is confusing."
  • "It's an expensive solution."
  • "For the price of five automation licenses, you simply would not be able to hire five manual testers for two years worth of 24/7 manual testing work on demand."
  • "The price is only $3,000. I don't know how many QA analysts you would have in any given company. Probably no more than five or 10. So if it's a large corporation, it can easily afford $15,000 to $25,000. I don't see that being an issue."
  • "The way the pricing model works is that you pay a whole boatload year one. Then, every year after, it is around half or less. Because instead of paying for the new product, you are just paying for the support and maintenance of it. That is probably one of the biggest things that I hear from most people, even at conferences, "Yeah, I would love to use UFT One, but we don't have a budget for it.""
  • "The pricing fee is good. If someone makes use of the solution once a day for a half hour then the fee will be more expensive. For continuous use and application of the solution to different use cases, the fee is average."
  • "The price is one aspect that could be improved."
  • More OpenText UFT One Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "​It is an expensive tool compared to other test automation tools. It has a lot of advantages over other tools."
  • "Expensive, but for long-term projects, it is paying back."
  • "The pricing is high, but altogether it offers you the ability to automate all sorts of applications: desktop, web, mobile, etc."
  • "We hired a consultant to figure out all the tools in our company and how they fit in our company before we purchased the solution."
  • "Tricentis Tosca may be relatively on the higher side in terms of pricing, but their sales rep can give pretty decent deals when asked."
  • "We have around 200 [concurrent] licenses and the cost around $1.4 million a year."
  • "My understanding is that it's an expensive product, although I don't know the specifics with regards to pricing."
  • "I would like to see better costing packs. There are several features but USD $11,000 for one license is expensive."
  • More Tricentis Tosca Pricing and Cost Advice →

    See Which Vendors Are Best For You

    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile App Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

    See Recommendations

    765,637 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Answers from the Community

    Compare OpenText UFT One vs Tricentis Tosca (7)

    Netanya Carmi

    Content Manager at PeerSpot (formerly IT Central Station)

    Question: How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

    Kevin Copple

    Reseller

    Both products are very useful but it really depends on what you need to test and who is building the tests. We recently chose UFT One over Tosca in a specific use case where identifying images inside a map was needed. UFT uses both OCR and Image recognition where in Tosca you would have to identify specific pixels and those pixels could move depending on what device you were using.

    From a test building perspective, I feel it is easier to build tests in UFT One than in Tosca. UFT One also gives you the ability to develop tests by eitherwriting code or using the record and convert to code option (Allows developers and Business users to work together to build/update the same test).

    If you can provide more info on what you are testing and your key drivers, I can try and give more info on what tool may be best.

    Leah Fainchtein Buenavida

    Real User

    We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing.

    MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well suited for CI integrations. We liked it, in particular, because it integrates greatly with other platforms, like .net, QC and Jenkins. An added advantage was the multi-device support.

    One of the best advantages of MicroFocus is that it integrates with legacy web technologies and even Windows client applications. Finally, MicroFocus supports cross-browser testing. Regardless of many features, including a test combinations generator and insight recording, it is relatively easy to learn.

    That being said, it doesn’t support multiple formats of reporting. For now, UFT only supports exporting reports in HTML or PDF. MicroFocus should allow exporting to Excel, CSV, XML, and other formats. There is a bit of performance degradation of the test environment when executing automation scripts continuously for a long time. The execution can be inconsistent sometimes, and scripting takes a long time. Another downside is the high licensing price.

    Tricentis Tosca is an integrated testing solution that includes testing automation and case design approach, risk-based testing, test data management, and service virtualization. The best feature is its versatility in helping both web and desktop applications. It is very reliable and stable. Another great feature is that you can reuse test cases.

    The platform supports multiple technologies and devices. It is truly end-to-end. Because it is scriptless, anyone can learn to use it.

    As much as we like it, there are downsides to Tosca, too. The price is one of them. It runs a bit expensive, but it is worth it. The test design section is complicated to learn, and the UI takes time to get used to.

    Conclusions

    Tosca is a better solution in terms of usability and versatility. MicroFocus is better for organizations with legacy web applications.

    See all 4 answers »

    Questions from the Community

    How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

    Top Answer:We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testingMicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well…more »

    Read all 2 answers →

    What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT One?

    Top Answer:My company has not had an issue with OpenText UFT One since we have been using it for the past three to four years.

    Read all 35 answers →

    What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT One?

    Top Answer:The product wasn't easy for developers to learn and pick up in the area revolving around scripting for automation, and there was a lot of resistance from developers, causing my company to rely on…more »

    Read all 34 answers →

    How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?

    Top Answer:Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with…more »

    What do you like most about Tricentis Tosca?

    Top Answer:As a codeless automation tool, the product offers a user-friendly experience without requiring extensive coding knowledge. Users can easily handle various applications, including web applications, SAP…more »

    Read all 36 answers →

    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tricentis Tosca?

    Top Answer:The tool's pricing is lower than that of other automation tools.

    Read all 31 answers →

    Ranking

    2nd

    out of 15 in Mobile App Testing Tools

    Views

    5,166

    Comparisons

    3,135

    Reviews

    20

    Average Words per Review

    694

    Rating

    7.9

    1st

    out of 15 in Mobile App Testing Tools

    Views

    6,596

    Comparisons

    3,460

    Reviews

    20

    Average Words per Review

    521

    Rating

    8.0

    Comparisons

    Compare OpenText UFT One vs Tricentis Tosca (10)

    OpenText UFT Developer vs. OpenText UFT One

    Compared 12% of the time.

    Compare OpenText UFT One vs Tricentis Tosca (11)

    Katalon Studio vs. OpenText UFT One

    Compared 9% of the time.

    Compare OpenText UFT One vs Tricentis Tosca (12)

    SmartBear TestComplete vs. OpenText UFT One

    Compared 5% of the time.

    Compare OpenText UFT One vs Tricentis Tosca (13)

    UiPath Test Suite vs. OpenText UFT One

    Compared 3% of the time.

    Compare OpenText UFT One vs Tricentis Tosca (14)

    Ranorex Studio vs. OpenText UFT One

    Compared 3% of the time.

    More OpenText UFT One Competitors →

    Compare OpenText UFT One vs Tricentis Tosca (15)

    Katalon Studio vs. Tricentis Tosca

    Compared 11% of the time.

    Compare OpenText UFT One vs Tricentis Tosca (16)

    Worksoft Certify vs. Tricentis Tosca

    Compared 10% of the time.

    Compare OpenText UFT One vs Tricentis Tosca (17)

    Postman vs. Tricentis Tosca

    Compared 6% of the time.

    Compare OpenText UFT One vs Tricentis Tosca (18)

    SmartBear TestComplete vs. Tricentis Tosca

    Compared 5% of the time.

    Compare OpenText UFT One vs Tricentis Tosca (19)

    Testim vs. Tricentis Tosca

    Compared 5% of the time.

    More Tricentis Tosca Competitors →

    Also Known As

    Micro Focus UFT One, UFT (QTP), Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro, QuickTest Professional, HPE UFT (QTP)

    Learn More

    Overview

    Our AI-powered functional testing tool accelerates test automation. It works across desktop, web, mobile, mainframe, composite, and packaged enterprise-grade applications.Read white paper

    Tricentis Tosca is a continuous testing platform that uses the industry’s most innovative functional testing technologies. Unlike traditional testing technologies, which are siloed and can allow for integration risks that are likely to derail end-to-end processes, Tricentis Tosca accelerates testing across the enterprise to keep pace with Agile and DevOps and helps enterprise teams to achieve 90%+ test automation rates, thereby enabling them to deliver fast and continuous feedback.

    Tosca enables your large enterprise to improve the quality of its applications by equipping you for optimizing, managing, and automating your software testing.

    This model-based approach to software test automation enables your organization to achieve high automation rates while at the same time maximizing business risk coverage. Tosca covers all digital initiatives, which includes moving to the cloud, modernizing core business apps, and delivering excellent customer experience.

    Tosca also provides market-leading test data provisioning, test case planning and design capabilities, service virtualization, and mobile testing. The solution is fully compatible with other testing solutions and with Application Lifecycle Management products.

    Benefits of Tricentis Tosca

    Tricentis Tosca optimizes and accelerates the end-to-end testing of your entire digital landscape. Its AI-powered codeless approach accelerates innovation across your enterprise by removing the bottlenecks from testing and the risks from software releases.

    Tosca’s functional testing tool covers every kind of testing, including API testing, exploratory testing, mobile testing, regression testing, and system integration testing. It also supports performance testing through integration with NeoLoad.

    The key benefits of Tricentis Tosca include:

    Acceleration of test automation with AI-powered technology that can track controls on any technology in real time.

    The shifting left of testing by automating tests based on mockups and then using those same tests as the app is developed.

    Smarter testing with Vision AI that keeps up with changes in your apps, regardless of the underlying platform.

    Creation of resilient, stable automation for any technology

    Vision AI’s integration with Tosca’s no-code platform makes test automation easy-to-use by business analyst and subject matter experts, regardless of skill level

    Reviews from Real Users

    PeerSpot users note that Tricentis Tosca is easy to learn, easy to maintain, and easy to automate. One user said that “It is a good tool that enables me to re-automate my scripts and update my scripts as quickly as possible." Another wrote that “The most valuable feature is the UI… The reporting is really nice.”

    Sample Customers

    Sage, JetBlue, Haufe.Group, Independent Health, Molina Healthcare, Cox Automotive, andTMNA Services

    HBO, AMEX, BMW Group, ING, Bosch, Austrian Airlines, Deutsche Bank, Henkel, Allianz, Bank of America, UBS, Orange, Siemens, Swiss Re, Vodafone

    Top Industries

    REVIEWERS

    Financial Services Firm32%

    Computer Software Company16%

    Insurance Company10%

    Healthcare Company10%

    VISITORS READING REVIEWS

    Financial Services Firm19%

    Computer Software Company15%

    Manufacturing Company11%

    Government7%

    REVIEWERS

    Financial Services Firm27%

    Computer Software Company25%

    Insurance Company11%

    Retailer7%

    VISITORS READING REVIEWS

    Computer Software Company15%

    Financial Services Firm14%

    Manufacturing Company11%

    Insurance Company7%

    Company Size

    REVIEWERS

    Small Business16%

    Midsize Enterprise14%

    Large Enterprise70%

    VISITORS READING REVIEWS

    Small Business15%

    Midsize Enterprise10%

    Large Enterprise75%

    REVIEWERS

    Small Business19%

    Midsize Enterprise21%

    Large Enterprise61%

    VISITORS READING REVIEWS

    Small Business15%

    Midsize Enterprise13%

    Large Enterprise72%

    Buyer's GuideOpenText UFT One vs. Tricentis ToscaMarch 2024

    Free Report: OpenText UFT One vs. Tricentis Tosca

    Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText UFT One vs. Tricentis Tosca and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.

    DOWNLOAD NOW

    765,637 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    OpenText UFT One is ranked 2nd in Mobile App Testing Tools with 89 reviews while Tricentis Tosca is ranked 1st in Mobile App Testing Tools with 96 reviews. OpenText UFT One is rated 8.0, while Tricentis Tosca is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of OpenText UFT One writes "With regularly occurring releases, a QA team member can schedule tests, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis Tosca writes "Does not require coding experience to use and comes with productivity and time-saving features ". OpenText UFT One is most compared with OpenText UFT Developer, Katalon Studio, SmartBear TestComplete, UiPath Test Suite and Ranorex Studio, whereas Tricentis Tosca is most compared with Katalon Studio, Worksoft Certify, Postman, SmartBear TestComplete and Testim. See our OpenText UFT One vs. Tricentis Tosca report.

    See our list of best Mobile App Testing Tools vendors, best Regression Testing Tools vendors, and best API Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Mobile App Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

    Users

    Provide a ReviewInfo for VendorsAdd a Product

    Company

    About UsBlogNewsCareersContact

    Policies

    PrivacyCookiesTerms of UseGuidelines

    © 2024 PeerSpot, All Rights Reserved.

    Compare OpenText UFT One vs Tricentis Tosca (2024)
    Top Articles
    Latest Posts
    Article information

    Author: Eusebia Nader

    Last Updated:

    Views: 6124

    Rating: 5 / 5 (80 voted)

    Reviews: 95% of readers found this page helpful

    Author information

    Name: Eusebia Nader

    Birthday: 1994-11-11

    Address: Apt. 721 977 Ebert Meadows, Jereville, GA 73618-6603

    Phone: +2316203969400

    Job: International Farming Consultant

    Hobby: Reading, Photography, Shooting, Singing, Magic, Kayaking, Mushroom hunting

    Introduction: My name is Eusebia Nader, I am a encouraging, brainy, lively, nice, famous, healthy, clever person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.